craZboy557 is an eight year old. Whenever he writes a response, he decides other peoples goals and reasons for himself, and heres a scenario:
this is normal logic
-i start a topic
-person comes and gives negative feedback in comparison to something else
-i spark flaws in what they are comparing to and give examples
-they understand and acknowledge by apologizing and giving some positive feedback on other examples
this is craZboy557 logic
-i start a topic
-person comes and gives negative feedback in comparison to something else
-i spark flaws in what they are comparing to and give examples
-they do not understand and reflect a similar example that both in comparison share, saying that what i described as what they thought was better was what i thought about my own side a of comparison
-i'm left dumbstruck due to how unlogical it remarks the very integers of my common sense